dope.security dope vs Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

dope.security dope

Mid-market and enterprise teams tired of backhauling endpoint traffic to cloud for security decisions should evaluate dope.security dope; its on-device proxy eliminates that round trip entirely, cutting latency while keeping access control local. The endpoint-first architecture directly addresses NIST PR.AA by enforcing authentication and access decisions at the point of user action, not in a distant security stack. Skip this if your organization needs centralized logging and reporting as a primary control mechanism; the distributed model prioritizes speed over traditional audit visibility.

Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection

Mid-market and enterprise security teams treating network perimeter enforcement as obsolete will get the most from Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection, particularly those shipping user and device traffic through a zero trust architecture where traditional firewalls fail. Its full TLS/SSL inspection at scale, paired with AI-powered threat detection and DNS security, anchors strong coverage across ID.RA Risk Assessment and DE.CM Continuous Monitoring. Skip this if your organization still relies heavily on on-premises infrastructure or needs mature incident response and recovery workflows; Zscaler prioritizes prevention and detection over the Response and Recovery functions in NIST CSF 2.0.