Q: Is Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise a good alternative to Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection?

Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise and Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection serve similar Security Service Edge use cases: both are Security Service Edge tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Question 1

What is the difference between Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise vs Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection?

Accepted Answer

**Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise**: Cloud-based DNS firewall protecting users and IoT devices from threats. built by Akamai. Core capabilities include Real-time threat intelligence blocking malicious domains and websites, DNS firewall inspection of all domain name system queries, Low-throughput DNS data exfiltration blocking..

**Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection**: Cloud-based zero trust platform for threat protection across users and devices. built by Zscaler. Core capabilities include Full TLS/SSL inspection at scale, AI-powered threat detection and prevention, Attack surface management with vulnerability identification..

Both serve the Security Service Edge market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Question 2

What features do Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise vs Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection offer?

Accepted Answer

**Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise** differentiates with Real-time threat intelligence blocking malicious domains and websites, DNS firewall inspection of all domain name system queries, Low-throughput DNS data exfiltration blocking. **Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection** differentiates with Full TLS/SSL inspection at scale, AI-powered threat detection and prevention, Attack surface management with vulnerability identification.

Question 3

Who makes Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise vs Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection?

Accepted Answer

**Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise** is developed by Akamai. **Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection** is developed by Zscaler. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.