Cato SSE 360 vs Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cato SSE 360

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing point security tools with a single cloud-native platform will get the most from Cato SSE 360, especially if WAN optimization and traffic steering matter as much as threat prevention. Its Single Pass Cloud Engine processes SWG, CASB, DLP, and ZTNA inspection in one pass across a private global backbone, cutting both latency and policy complexity. Skip this if your organization needs depth in DLP fingerprinting or forensic recovery; Cato prioritizes access control and continuous monitoring over data loss investigation.

Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection

Mid-market and enterprise security teams treating network perimeter enforcement as obsolete will get the most from Zscaler Cyberthreat Protection, particularly those shipping user and device traffic through a zero trust architecture where traditional firewalls fail. Its full TLS/SSL inspection at scale, paired with AI-powered threat detection and DNS security, anchors strong coverage across ID.RA Risk Assessment and DE.CM Continuous Monitoring. Skip this if your organization still relies heavily on on-premises infrastructure or needs mature incident response and recovery workflows; Zscaler prioritizes prevention and detection over the Response and Recovery functions in NIST CSF 2.0.