Cyber Crucible Cyber Crucible vs Doorman: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Cyber Crucible Cyber Crucible is a commercial endpoint detection and response tool by Cyber Crucible. Doorman is a free endpoint detection and response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best endpoint detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
SMB and mid-market teams drowning in ransomware and credential theft will find value in Cyber Crucible's sub-200-millisecond autonomous response, which stops attacks before your analysts even see the alert. The patented analytics engine and on-system decision-making handle data theft prevention across desktops, servers, and cloud without requiring a SOC to babysit every incident, addressing the NIST Detect and Respond gap most EDR tools leave open. Skip this if you need mature incident investigation workflows or deep forensic replay; Cyber Crucible prioritizes prevention and root cause storage over post-breach analysis.
Security teams managing osquery at scale will find Doorman's lightweight approach to fleet management valuable when your infrastructure is already built on osquery and you need remote configuration control without the overhead of a commercial EDR platform. The free pricing and 620 GitHub stars reflect active use in lean security shops running osquery across hundreds of nodes. Skip this if you need behavioral threat detection or response automation; Doorman is query management only, not endpoint detection, so it pairs with osquery's detection capabilities rather than replacing them.
