CoSoSys Endpoint Protector vs ThreatLocker Storage Control: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector: Multi-OS DLP solution for endpoint data discovery, monitoring, and protection. built by Endpoint Protector. Core capabilities include USB and peripheral device control with granular policies, Content-aware file transfer monitoring and blocking, Automatic USB encryption..

ThreatLocker Storage Control: Policy-driven storage device access control for USB, network, and local drives. built by threatlocker. Core capabilities include Policy-driven storage device access control, Granular policies based on user, time, application, device serial number, vendor, and file type, Centralized audit logging of all file access on USB, network, and local drives..

Both serve the Data Loss Prevention market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector differentiates with USB and peripheral device control with granular policies, Content-aware file transfer monitoring and blocking, Automatic USB encryption. ThreatLocker Storage Control differentiates with Policy-driven storage device access control, Granular policies based on user, time, application, device serial number, vendor, and file type, Centralized audit logging of all file access on USB, network, and local drives.

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector is developed by Endpoint Protector. ThreatLocker Storage Control is developed by threatlocker. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and ThreatLocker Storage Control serve similar Data Loss Prevention use cases: both are Data Loss Prevention tools, both cover USB Security. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.