CL Digital GRC Platform vs Drata Continuous Trust: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CL Digital GRC Platform

Mid-market and SMB security leaders drowning in spreadsheet-based compliance tracking will see immediate value in CL Digital GRC Platform's centralized policy and risk management workflow. The platform covers seven NIST CSF 2.0 Govern functions including organizational context, risk strategy, and oversight, which means you're actually closing the gap between what your board thinks your risk posture is and what it actually is. Skip this if your organization needs deep technical controls mapping or runs a heavily federated governance model; CL Digital's strength is in consolidating compliance ownership and stakeholder visibility, not in automating technical remediation across hundreds of servers.

Drata Continuous Trust

Mid-market and enterprise compliance teams buried in multi-framework audits should start with Drata Continuous Trust because its AI automation actually reduces questionnaire response time instead of just cataloging frameworks side-by-side. The platform covers 10 of 11 NIST CSF 2.0 Govern functions and excels at supply chain risk management and policy enforcement, which means less manual vendor tracking spreadsheets. Skip this if your organization needs deep detection and response capabilities; Drata prioritizes the upstream compliance work, not the downstream security operations that catch active threats.