AzureC2Relay vs C3: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
AzureC2Relay is a free offensive security tool. C3 is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers running Cobalt Strike campaigns through Azure need AzureC2Relay to hide C2 traffic behind legitimate cloud infrastructure without burning blue team detections on obviously malicious beacon patterns. The tool validates traffic against your Malleable C2 profile before relaying through an Azure Function, meaning only properly authenticated beacons get through; attackers often skip this layer and get caught on the first anomalous request. Skip this if you're not already deeply comfortable with Azure Functions, Malleable C2 profiles, and infrastructure-as-code deployments; the 236 GitHub stars reflect a small, skilled audience rather than a tool that abstracts away operator complexity.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to quickly prototype custom C2 channels without writing infrastructure from scratch should use C3; its integration with existing offensive toolkits like Metasploit and Cobalt Strike cuts weeks off typical channel development. The framework ships with working examples for HTTP, DNS, and HTTPS protocols, letting operators focus on evasion logic rather than socket programming. Skip this if your team needs a polished UI or commercial support; C3 is deliberately a builder's tool for operators comfortable with code.
