Atlas Systems ComplyScore® vs FortifyData Security Ratings: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Atlas Systems ComplyScore®

Mid-market and enterprise security teams buried in vendor questionnaires will see immediate ROI from Atlas Systems ComplyScore® because its AI pre-fills assessments to 60% completion and auto-maps evidence to 30+ compliance frameworks, cutting onboarding cycles from weeks to days. The platform's real-time continuous monitoring and multi-dimensional risk scoring with transparent factor attribution address NIST GV.SC and ID.RA requirements without requiring manual risk recalculation after every change. Skip this if your vendor base is under 50 third parties or if you need deep forensic investigation capabilities; ComplyScore assumes you want speed and compliance readiness over investigative depth.

FortifyData Security Ratings

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing sprawling vendor ecosystems will get the most from FortifyData Security Ratings because its weekly asset discovery updates catch new third-party relationships before risk assessment cycles even start. The platform maps to NIST GV.SC and ID.AM by design, automatically surfacing in-scope vendors and their attack surface without manual questionnaire overhead. Skip this if your primary need is incident response orchestration or if you're already embedded in a point solution that does vendor risk adequately; FortifyData's strength is breadth of third-party visibility, not depth in any single risk domain.