Assetnote ASM vs RADICL Managed Attack Surface: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Assetnote ASM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing sprawling external infrastructure will get the most from Assetnote ASM because its hourly asset discovery actually catches exposures before your business units spin up new services, not weeks after. The platform covers ID.AM and DE.CM across NIST CSF 2.0, meaning you're building a real asset inventory while monitoring it continuously, and the exploit-based verification eliminates the noise that buries actionable findings in traditional scanners. Skip this if your organization lacks the headcount to operationalize a workflow-driven program; Assetnote's strength is enabling lean teams to prioritize, not giving you a dashboard to ignore.

RADICL Managed Attack Surface

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in vulnerability backlogs need RADICL Managed Attack Surface because it actually closes vulnerabilities instead of just finding them; the virtual SOC team handles remediation coordination and independent verification, turning discovery into evidence you can audit. The risk-prioritized escalation with predefined runbooks and SLA tracking means critical findings move through your change windows without the usual coordination tax between security and IT. Not the right fit if you need vulnerability scanning as a standalone feed to plug into existing SIEM workflows; RADICL assumes you want to delegate the entire remediation workflow, which is either your biggest pain point or not really a problem you have.