Is Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust a good alternative to Aviatrix Zero Trust for Workloads?

Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust and Aviatrix Zero Trust for Workloads serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both are Zero Trust Network Access tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust vs Aviatrix Zero Trust for Workloads (2026)

Q: What is the difference between Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust vs Aviatrix Zero Trust for Workloads?

**Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust**: Zero Trust Access Gateway providing identity-based, per-app access control. built by Array Networks. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include Single Packet Authorization (SPA), Multi-factor authentication and single sign-on, Continuous adaptive access control with policy engine.. **Aviatrix Zero Trust for Workloads**: Zero trust workload protection for VMs, containers, K8s, and serverless. built by Aviatrix. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include Distributed cloud firewall with real-time traffic inspection, Identity-aware policies for east-west segmentation, SmartGroups for dynamic workload policy mapping.. Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Q: What features do Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust vs Aviatrix Zero Trust for Workloads offer?

**Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust** differentiates with Single Packet Authorization (SPA), Multi-factor authentication and single sign-on, Continuous adaptive access control with policy engine. **Aviatrix Zero Trust for Workloads** differentiates with Distributed cloud firewall with real-time traffic inspection, Identity-aware policies for east-west segmentation, SmartGroups for dynamic workload policy mapping.

Q: Who makes Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust vs Aviatrix Zero Trust for Workloads?

**Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust** is developed by Array Networks. **Aviatrix Zero Trust for Workloads** is developed by Aviatrix. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.