Akeyless Multi-Cloud KMS BYOK vs ZAMA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Akeyless Multi-Cloud KMS BYOK is a commercial key management tool by Akeyless Security. ZAMA is a free confidential computing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best key management fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: our scores and rankings are earned, never bought — sponsored placement is always labeled.
CST VerdictShort answer
Enterprise and mid-market security teams managing encryption keys across AWS, Azure, and GCP will find Akeyless Multi-Cloud KMS BYOK valuable for eliminating key sprawl without surrendering control to hyperscaler KMS services. The platform's automated rotation, centralized audit trails, and NIST PR.AA and PR.DS alignment mean you're not just centralizing key management; you're building a control plane that actually shows you who accessed what and when. Skip this if your organization runs primarily on a single cloud and lacks the compliance pressure that makes BYOK economics work, or if you need the KMS to also handle application secrets and database credentials in one system. Developers building privacy-critical applications on public blockchains or untrusted infrastructure need fhEVM Coprocessor because it's the only open-source tool that lets you perform computations on encrypted data without decrypting it first, eliminating the exposure window entirely. The library supports arbitrary smart contract logic through Fully Homomorphic Encryption, meaning your data stays encrypted end-to-end in NIST Protect and Govern functions. Skip this if your team lacks cryptography expertise or you need a point-and-click masking tool for legacy databases; fhEVM requires developers to architect around encrypted computation from the ground up, not bolt encryption onto existing systems.
