42Crunch API Security Platform vs Salt Security Salt Collect: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

42Crunch API Security Platform

Security teams building APIs at scale need 42Crunch API Security Platform to catch BOLA and BFLA vulnerabilities before runtime, which most DAST tools miss because they don't understand OpenAPI contracts. The platform scores high on PR.DS (Data Security) and DE.CM (Continuous Monitoring) by enforcing schemas at runtime without proxying traffic through 42Crunch's infrastructure, meaning your data stays in your control. This isn't the right fit if your API footprint is small or static; the value compounds when you're shipping dozens of endpoints across multiple teams and need automated scanning in CI/CD plus real-time request blocking.

Salt Security Salt Collect

Security teams managing sprawling API estates where runtime visibility is the bottleneck should choose Salt Security Salt Collect because it maps actual traffic patterns to OWASP API Top 10 risks rather than relying on static scanning alone. The tool ingests continuous API calls through downloadable collectors across hybrid environments, then baselines normal behavior to flag anomalies in real time, covering the full arc from asset discovery through detection (NIST ID.AM, DE.CM). Skip this if your APIs are largely internal or you need drift detection without behavioral analysis; Salt Collect assumes mature API traffic volume where behavioral baselining actually works.