24x7 MDR (Sophos) vs Mead SOC: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
24x7 MDR (Sophos) is a commercial managed detection and response tool by IntraLAN. Mead SOC is a commercial managed detection and response tool by Mead Informatica. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best managed detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need threat hunting and incident response outsourced entirely should consider 24x7 MDR (Sophos); the service prioritizes detection and analysis over your team doing the heavy lifting, with around-the-clock analysts triaging Sophos platform alerts and conducting investigations under NIST RS.AN. The cloud deployment means no infrastructure overhead, which matters if your SOC is understaffed or nonexistent. Skip this if you have mature internal analysts who prefer owning the investigation workflow or if you need deep integration with non-Sophos endpoints; you'll be paying for a managed service when you don't need one.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams in Europe will get the most from Mead SOC because you're buying a staffed 24/7 operation with domain expertise built for your region's regulatory environment, not just a detection platform. The vendor covers the full detection-to-analysis loop across NIST DE.CM and DE.AE, plus adds personnel training and risk assessment that most MDR shops skip. Skip this if your team needs to own the SOC function yourself or if you're locked into a North American-first vendor ecosystem; Mead's value compounds when you're willing to outsource monitoring and let local expertise handle your threat posture.
