Fortra ZTNA vs Xage Secure Remote Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN will find Fortra ZTNA's strongest value in its hybrid deployment flexibility and granular access controls that actually enforce least-privilege without admin headaches. The platform covers all four critical NIST CSF 2.0 areas for identity and continuous monitoring, which matters because most ZTNA products punt on asset inventory or detection tuning. Skip this if your org needs deep integration with legacy on-premises identity systems or runs exclusively on-prem; Fortra's strength is in hybrid environments where cloud and datacenter access requirements overlap. Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing critical infrastructure will benefit most from Xage Secure Remote Access because it applies zero trust down to individual operational assets like PLCs and RTUs, not just network perimeters. The distributed security fabric with asset-level access control and tamper-proof audit logs directly addresses NIST PR.AA (identity and access control) and DE.CM (continuous monitoring), the two functions that matter most when a compromised credentials can shut down production. Skip this if your OT environment is air-gapped already or if you need a tool that also handles IT asset management; Xage is deliberately OT-focused.

Based on our analysis of core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion: