Microsoft Entra ID vs Trusona Passkeys: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Microsoft Entra ID

Enterprise and mid-market teams already committed to Microsoft 365 should choose Microsoft Entra ID because it eliminates the identity tax of managing a separate platform, with conditional access policies that actually enforce what your Microsoft-native apps require. NIST CSF 2.0 coverage on PR.AA (Identity Management, Authentication, and Access Control) is solid, and the integration with Security Copilot means threat investigation workflows stay within your existing Microsoft ecosystem rather than forcing context-switching. Skip this if you need deep API governance or fine-grained entitlements for non-Microsoft SaaS applications; Entra ID treats those as secondary use cases, and you'll end up stitching in third-party tools anyway.

Trusona Passkeys

Security teams at startups and SMBs tired of password reset tickets will see immediate friction relief with Trusona Passkeys; FIDO-based passkey authentication eliminates the phishing surface that MFA alone leaves open, and the passwordless model cuts support overhead without requiring the identity infrastructure bigger enterprises can justify. The NIST PR.AA coverage confirms proper access control implementation at the core. Skip this if you need deep integration with legacy on-premises systems or advanced step-up authentication rules; Trusona's strength is simplicity, not policy complexity.