Orca Security Application Security vs Sysdig Secure: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Orca Security Application Security

Developers and security teams shipping containerized applications need Orca Security Application Security because it traces risk from source code through infrastructure-as-code to running containers without requiring agents or separate tooling sprawl. The platform covers SAST, SCA, IaC scanning, and secrets detection with one-click remediation via pull requests, reducing the friction that kills adoption in fast-moving teams. Skip this if your priority is runtime threat detection or you need deep CSPM capabilities; Orca prioritizes the software supply chain and pre-deployment hardening over post-deployment behavioral analysis.

Sysdig Secure

Mid-market and enterprise teams running containerized workloads need Sysdig Secure for its runtime-first approach to threat detection; it combines Falco-powered process-level visibility with cloud context in ways that catch active exploitation attempts that posture scanners alone miss. The Cloud Attack Graph ties runtime alerts to actual entitlements and misconfigurations, which means your alerts come with built-in risk prioritization instead of noise. Skip this if your stack is primarily serverless or you need deep CSPM coverage as your primary control; Sysdig Secure is stronger on the Detect and Continuous Monitoring side of NIST CSF than on the Govern side.