CloudDefense.AI QINA vs Sysdig Secure: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CloudDefense.AI QINA

Security teams at mid-market and enterprise organizations need CloudDefense.AI QINA if they're tired of stitching together separate tools for code, container, and cloud security. The sub-60 second CI/CD scan completion and AI-powered reachability analysis actually reduce alert fatigue instead of just claiming to, and native support for SAST, DAST, API testing, and CSPM means you're not maintaining six different vendor relationships. Skip this if your team lacks the infrastructure maturity to act on multi-layered findings quickly; QINA will surface real vulnerabilities across your entire stack, but weak remediation workflows will leave you buried.

Sysdig Secure

Mid-market and enterprise teams running containerized workloads need Sysdig Secure for its runtime-first approach to threat detection; it combines Falco-powered process-level visibility with cloud context in ways that catch active exploitation attempts that posture scanners alone miss. The Cloud Attack Graph ties runtime alerts to actual entitlements and misconfigurations, which means your alerts come with built-in risk prioritization instead of noise. Skip this if your stack is primarily serverless or you need deep CSPM coverage as your primary control; Sysdig Secure is stronger on the Detect and Continuous Monitoring side of NIST CSF than on the Govern side.