Deepfence vs Sweet Security Runtime CNAPP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Deepfence

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting containerized workloads need Deepfence for its runtime attack analysis, which catches post-deployment threats that static scanning alone will miss. The tool covers seven NIST CSF 2.0 functions from asset identification through incident response, with particular strength in continuous monitoring and adverse event analysis; this depth matters when you're running containers at scale. Skip this if your primary concern is compliance checkbox coverage or if you need tight CSPM integration, since Deepfence prioritizes runtime threats over infrastructure-as-code scanning.

Sweet Security Runtime CNAPP

Mid-market and enterprise teams running AI workloads need Sweet Security Runtime CNAPP because its purpose-built LLM actually deprioritizes noise instead of just generating more alerts. The vendor covers four of six NIST CSF 2.0 core functions, with particular strength in DE.CM and DE.AE; the AI stack security monitoring for models, agents, and architecture fills a gap most runtime platforms ignore entirely. Skip this if you need broad CSPM or vulnerability scanning in the same tool; Sweet Security is deliberately focused on runtime detection and AI-specific threats, not asset inventory or compliance reporting.