Soteria Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) vs Tailscale: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Soteria Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

SMB and mid-market teams replacing VPN will see immediate value in Soteria Zero Trust Network Access because per-application access control actually stops lateral movement where traditional segmentation fails. The cloud-native architecture means no on-premises appliances to manage, and continuous device posture monitoring plus real-time access revocation cover both NIST PR.AA and DE.CM without requiring separate tools. Skip this if you need on-premises deployment or tight integration with an existing firewall ecosystem; Soteria's strength is being purpose-built for remote-first, identity-centric access, not retrofitting legacy network architecture.

Tailscale

Teams replacing bastion hosts and VPN infrastructure with zero trust network access should pick Tailscale for its WireGuard mesh that eliminates inbound firewall rules entirely, letting you enforce identity-based policies without managing jump servers or exposed infrastructure. The platform maps cleanly to NIST PR.AA and PR.IR, particularly for organizations building multi-cloud environments where traditional perimeter security becomes liability rather than asset. Skip this if you need granular application-layer inspection or deep packet analysis; Tailscale is network-layer connectivity, not a proxy or firewall replacement.