Sophos Cloud Native Security vs Sysdig Secure: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Sophos Cloud Native Security

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing multi-cloud infrastructure with compliance requirements should pick Sophos Cloud Native Security for its breadth across workload protection, identity access control, and audit-ready reporting without forcing agent deployment across every environment. The platform covers six major cloud and container ecosystems (AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, IaC, Docker Hub) with both agentless and agent-based options, and generates compliance assessments that map to audit frameworks out of the box. Skip this if your priority is runtime detection depth over breadth; Sophos prioritizes posture and policy enforcement (NIST PR.AA and ID.AM) ahead of continuous anomaly hunting.

Sysdig Secure

Mid-market and enterprise teams running containerized workloads need Sysdig Secure for its runtime-first approach to threat detection; it combines Falco-powered process-level visibility with cloud context in ways that catch active exploitation attempts that posture scanners alone miss. The Cloud Attack Graph ties runtime alerts to actual entitlements and misconfigurations, which means your alerts come with built-in risk prioritization instead of noise. Skip this if your stack is primarily serverless or you need deep CSPM coverage as your primary control; Sysdig Secure is stronger on the Detect and Continuous Monitoring side of NIST CSF than on the Govern side.