Cloudflare WAF vs SiteLock Pro: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cloudflare WAF

Startups and SMBs with limited security ops capacity should pick Cloudflare WAF for its zero-trust integration with your existing DNS and CDN layers, eliminating the need for separate appliance management. The platform handles NIST PR.PS and PR.IR through managed rulesets and DDoS mitigation without requiring full-time WAF tuning; you're inheriting Cloudflare's threat intelligence across their 280+ million daily requests. Skip this if you need granular application layer control or extensive custom rule development; the managed approach trades flexibility for speed-to-protection.

SiteLock Pro

SMBs and mid-market teams without dedicated security staff should pick SiteLock Pro for its automated malware scanning and one-click WordPress patching, which eliminate the manual work of staying ahead of common vulnerabilities. The platform covers four critical NIST functions,Platform Security, Infrastructure Resilience, Continuous Monitoring, and Risk Assessment,reflecting a breadth that handles both prevention and detection simultaneously. Skip this if you need granular WAF tuning or run non-WordPress CMS platforms; SiteLock's automation works best for teams that want security to run in the background.