EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 vs SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams struggling with lateral movement inside industrial networks will find real value in ThinGUARD 2.0's device-level access control, which actually stops unauthorized movement between functional units rather than just logging it. The plug-and-play deployment means you're not rewriting control system logic or waiting months for integration, and the NIST PR.AA and DE.CM alignment proves it delivers on identity lockdown and continuous visibility simultaneously. Skip this if your priority is recovery and resilience over access prevention; ThinGUARD is built for containment, not post-breach orchestration.

SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging

Enterprise and mid-market OT security teams protecting EV charging networks should evaluate SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging for its ISO 15118 Plug & Charge compliance and integrated PKI lifecycle management, which eliminates the common gap between charger hardware and identity provisioning that leaves most deployments vulnerable to protocol-level attacks. The vendor's VaultIC secure elements handle both certificate management and firmware updates within the same silicon, addressing the NIST PR.AA and PR.DS functions that most charging operators struggle to implement consistently across distributed charger fleets. Skip this if your EV charging infrastructure is still running legacy non-connected chargers or if you need application-layer visibility beyond the charging protocol itself; SEALSQ focuses narrowly on the authentication and encryption layer, not fleet operations or grid integration.