AhnLab CPS PLUS vs SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AhnLab CPS PLUS

Mid-market and enterprise operations teams protecting manufacturing or critical infrastructure will find AhnLab CPS PLUS valuable for its unidirectional data diode capability and portable endpoint scanning, which work in air-gapped or severely restricted OT networks where standard agents fail. The platform covers 10 of 23 NIST CSF 2.0 functions with particular strength in asset identification, continuous monitoring, and incident analysis across IT and OT together. Skip this if your priority is recovery and resilience post-breach; AhnLab emphasizes prevention and detection over response coordination, and the Asia-Pacific vendor presence means longer support latencies for North American teams.

SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging

Enterprise and mid-market OT security teams protecting EV charging networks should evaluate SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging for its ISO 15118 Plug & Charge compliance and integrated PKI lifecycle management, which eliminates the common gap between charger hardware and identity provisioning that leaves most deployments vulnerable to protocol-level attacks. The vendor's VaultIC secure elements handle both certificate management and firmware updates within the same silicon, addressing the NIST PR.AA and PR.DS functions that most charging operators struggle to implement consistently across distributed charger fleets. Skip this if your EV charging infrastructure is still running legacy non-connected chargers or if you need application-layer visibility beyond the charging protocol itself; SEALSQ focuses narrowly on the authentication and encryption layer, not fleet operations or grid integration.