Attestiv Analysis Starter Service vs ScamAI: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Attestiv Analysis Starter Service

Startups and SMBs handling user-generated content or facing synthetic media fraud will find real value in Attestiv Analysis Starter Service because it catches deepfakes and AI-generated content at scale without requiring forensics expertise. The service maps directly to NIST DE.AE (anomaly detection) and RS.AN (incident investigation), meaning you get both flagging and analysis in one workflow. Skip this if your primary concern is recovering from a breach rather than preventing spoofed media from entering your systems in the first place; Attestiv prioritizes detection over post-incident forensics.

ScamAI

Teams defending against synthetic media in customer-facing channels,social engineering, fraud verification, content moderation,should start with ScamAI for its real-time detection across image, audio, and video without requiring forensic-grade analysis on every submission. The Eva-v1-Fast model processes standard uploads at scale while Active Liveness catches presentation attacks in live verification flows, covering both DE.CM continuous monitoring and DE.AE incident detection. Skip this if you need post-breach forensics or deep synthetic attribution; ScamAI prioritizes blocking fakes at intake, not investigating them after the fact.