Guardpot AI-Powered Cyber Deception vs pghoney: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Guardpot AI-Powered Cyber Deception

Security teams at mid-market and enterprise companies who need to catch lateral movement and credential theft before they become breaches should use Guardpot AI-Powered Cyber Deception for its zero false-positive detection model and Active Directory integration that actually flags stolen credentials in real time. The platform's hybrid deployment across physical and virtual assets combined with automated firewall blocking of detected malicious IPs means you're not just alerting on compromise; you're disrupting it immediately. Skip this if your priority is post-incident forensics or you need a vendor with a large support organization; Guardpot prioritizes early detection over investigative depth, and a five-person team means you're buying into a leaner model.

pghoney

Security teams building internal deception infrastructure on a shoestring budget should start with pghoney if they're already running Postgres; it requires minimal setup and gives you a working honeypot in an afternoon rather than weeks of custom development. The 20 GitHub stars and active fork history show it's been battle-tested enough to catch real reconnaissance traffic against database ports. Skip this if you need honeypots across multiple database types or platforms; pghoney is deliberately single-purpose and won't replace a full deception platform like Honeyd or commercial equivalents.