Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Sysdig Secure: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud

Enterprise security teams shipping code through complex CI/CD pipelines will get the most from Prisma Cloud because it catches misconfigurations and secrets before they reach production, not after. Coverage spans Infrastructure as Code scanning, secrets detection, and software composition analysis all wired into your build process, plus agentless workload scanning that doesn't require agents at scale. Skip this if your organization runs mostly on-premises infrastructure or prioritizes runtime threat detection over prevention; Prisma Cloud's strength is shifting left, not hunting active compromise.

Sysdig Secure

Mid-market and enterprise teams running containerized workloads need Sysdig Secure for its runtime-first approach to threat detection; it combines Falco-powered process-level visibility with cloud context in ways that catch active exploitation attempts that posture scanners alone miss. The Cloud Attack Graph ties runtime alerts to actual entitlements and misconfigurations, which means your alerts come with built-in risk prioritization instead of noise. Skip this if your stack is primarily serverless or you need deep CSPM coverage as your primary control; Sysdig Secure is stronger on the Detect and Continuous Monitoring side of NIST CSF than on the Govern side.