o365recon vs BloodHound: 2026 Comparison
o365recon is a free penetration testing tool. BloodHound is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers running Office 365 assessments need o365recon because it pulls user enumeration, tenant configuration, and permission mappings from Azure AD using valid credentials, giving you reconnaissance data in minutes instead of hours of manual API queries. The tool's 731 GitHub stars and active maintenance reflect real adoption in offensive security workflows. Skip this if you're looking for unauthenticated reconnaissance or cloud infrastructure scanning beyond Microsoft's identity stack; o365recon assumes you already have compromised or test credentials and focuses narrowly on what those credentials expose.
Penetration testers and red teamers need BloodHound to map Active Directory attack paths that manual testing misses; the graph visualization finds transitive trust relationships and permission chains that would take weeks to discover by hand. The tool is free and has 10,325 GitHub stars, meaning you're inheriting battle-tested logic from thousands of real assessments. Skip BloodHound if your team lacks AD expertise to interpret the output or if you need automated exploitation; it's a discovery and visualization engine, not a post-exploitation framework.
