nfspy vs PlexTrac Pentest Reporting: 2026 Comparison
nfspy is a free penetration testing tool. PlexTrac Pentest Reporting is a commercial penetration testing tool by PlexTrac. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to simulate NFS credential theft will find nfspy invaluable for exposing how easily clients can be spoofed on misconfigured networks; it's the only free tool that does this specific attack without requiring kernel modules or custom compilation. The 299 GitHub stars and zero dependencies make it trivial to deploy in lab environments or during engagements where you need to validate NFS ACL weaknesses quickly. Skip this if your focus is post-exploitation persistence or lateral movement beyond the NFS protocol itself; nfspy is a narrow, sharp instrument for one attack surface, not a general-purpose network compromise tool.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in pentest reports from multiple vendors will get real value from PlexTrac Pentest Reporting because it actually closes the gap between finding vulnerabilities and tracking remediation to completion. The platform aggregates findings across your pentest tools and vendors into one prioritized backlog, then tracks remediation workflows through to closure, which directly addresses the NIST ID.RA and GV.RM functions most pentesting programs ignore. Skip this if your organization runs only occasional pentests with a single vendor and doesn't need remediation tracking; you'll be paying for centralization you don't use yet.
