Mimecast Engage vs NINJIO Cybersecurity Awareness Training: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Mimecast Engage

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in phishing clicks will see immediate ROI from Mimecast Engage because it identifies and retrains your highest-risk employees in real time rather than waiting for annual training cycles. The platform covers PR.AT and ID.RA across NIST CSF 2.0, meaning it closes gaps in both awareness delivery and the risk assessment that should drive who gets trained first. Skip this if your organization has already solved employee behavior through other means or if you need detection and response capabilities; Mimecast Engage is purely behavioral training, not threat hunting.

NINJIO Cybersecurity Awareness Training

Security teams at startups and SMBs who need awareness training that actually sticks will find NINJIO's emotional profiling and monthly breach-based microlearning more effective than generic compliance videos. The platform covers NIST PR.AT and ID.RA requirements, and the one-click phishing reporter plus adaptive difficulty simulation create measurable behavior change faster than static modules. Skip this if you need a single vendor handling detection and response; NINJIO's managed services are add-ons, not core strengths, and the focus here is purely changing how humans respond to threats.