Guardpot AI-Powered Cyber Deception vs Log4Pot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Guardpot AI-Powered Cyber Deception

Security teams at mid-market and enterprise companies who need to catch lateral movement and credential theft before they become breaches should use Guardpot AI-Powered Cyber Deception for its zero false-positive detection model and Active Directory integration that actually flags stolen credentials in real time. The platform's hybrid deployment across physical and virtual assets combined with automated firewall blocking of detected malicious IPs means you're not just alerting on compromise; you're disrupting it immediately. Skip this if your priority is post-incident forensics or you need a vendor with a large support organization; Guardpot prioritizes early detection over investigative depth, and a five-person team means you're buying into a leaner model.

Log4Pot

Security teams running Java applications who need to confirm Log4Shell exploitation attempts in their environment should deploy Log4Pot; it's free and purpose-built specifically for this vulnerability, so you're not paying for detection breadth you don't need. The 91 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal it's being used in production by practitioners who've already solved the "which honeypot catches Log4j" question. Skip this if you're looking for a general-purpose honeypot framework that covers multiple vulnerability classes or integrates with your SOAR; Log4Pot's narrowness is its strength, not a limitation.