Keeper Zero-Trust Security vs PassBolt: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Keeper Zero-Trust Security is a commercial password management tool by Keeper Security. PassBolt is a commercial password management tool by Passbolt. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best password management fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams enforcing least-privilege access across developers, infrastructure, and remote workers will get the most from Keeper Zero-Trust Security; its zero-knowledge vault architecture means the vendor itself cannot access your credentials, even under legal pressure. SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certification back that claim, and the platform's secrets management for DevOps teams addresses a real gap most password managers ignore. Skip this if you need integrated identity governance or deep privileged access management reporting; Keeper handles enforcement well but treats visibility as secondary to the vault itself.
Teams in startups and mid-market companies that need encrypted credential sharing without trusting a third-party SaaS vendor should choose Passbolt. Its open-source architecture and hybrid deployment model eliminate vendor lock-in while meeting PR.AA and PR.DS requirements through end-to-end encryption that keeps the vendor itself unable to access stored secrets. Skip this if your organization requires advanced identity governance, audit workflows, or single sign-on integrations; Passbolt is a credential vault first, not an IAM platform.
