IBM QRadar EDR vs YARA-Endpoint: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
IBM QRadar EDR is a commercial endpoint detection and response tool by IBM. YARA-Endpoint is a free endpoint detection and response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best endpoint detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in endpoint alerts will see immediate value in IBM QRadar EDR's AI-powered false-positive reduction, which cuts noise enough to let analysts actually investigate real threats. The NanoOS deep visibility layer and DeStra custom detection rules let you tune detection precisely to your environment rather than accepting vendor defaults. Skip this if your team lacks the SOC maturity to operationalize guided remediation workflows; QRadar EDR assumes you have analysts who can act on automated insights, not replace them entirely.
Security teams building detection pipelines on constrained budgets should choose YARA-Endpoint for its lightweight agent footprint and rule-driven approach to incident response. The free pricing model and client-server architecture let you deploy pattern matching across hundreds of endpoints without licensing friction, making it practical for lean SOCs or organizations piloting behavioral detection before commercial EDR adoption. This is not the tool for teams needing centralized threat hunting, automated response playbooks, or integration with your existing SIEM; YARA-Endpoint excels at detection rules, not orchestration.
