Censys Threat Hunting vs Hypernative Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Censys Threat Hunting

Security teams hunting adversary infrastructure before it hits your perimeter should use Censys Threat Hunting; its correlation engine automatically connects malware C2 servers, phishing domains, and exploit infrastructure across 155+ families in real time. The platform covers three NIST Detect functions (continuous monitoring, adverse event analysis, and risk assessment), but it's detection-forward; you'll do the response work elsewhere. Skip this if you need post-breach forensics or want your threat intel bundled with endpoint detection, since Censys is purpose-built for finding what's out there, not what's already inside.

Hypernative Platform

Mid-market and enterprise teams securing blockchain infrastructure will get real value from Hypernative Platform's mempool-layer threat detection, which catches attacks before they land onchain. The platform detects 200-300+ risk types across security, operational, and financial domains, then executes automated responses like contract pausing and fund movement without manual intervention. Skip this if your organization runs primarily traditional infrastructure; Hypernative is purpose-built for Web3 teams where transaction-level visibility and sub-second response windows matter more than breadth across legacy systems.