Cequence API Security vs Hypernative Firewall: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cequence API Security

Teams managing sprawling API ecosystems without visibility into shadow or third-party APIs should start with Cequence API Security; its automated discovery and ML-based risk categorization catches what manual inventories miss, and native integration with CI/CD pipelines means you can shift left without rearchitecting your pipeline. The platform maps to NIST ID.AM and DE.CM, giving you both asset visibility and continuous monitoring from day one. Skip this if your organization has fewer than 50 APIs or you need a WAF replacement; Cequence assumes you're already past the "do we have APIs" phase and moving toward "which ones are actually exposed.

Hypernative Firewall

Protocol teams and DeFi platforms need Hypernative Firewall because it stops malicious transactions before they execute, not after they drain liquidity. The firewall operates at 7K gas per check, making it economical enough to run on every transaction, and its execution logic analysis catches exploit patterns that simple allowlist filtering misses. Skip this if your organization needs post-incident forensics or cross-chain orchestration; Hypernative prioritizes real-time blocking on a single chain and assumes you can tolerate the operational overhead of managing client-defined rulesets.