Guardpot AI-Powered Cyber Deception vs Honey Ports: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Guardpot AI-Powered Cyber Deception

Security teams at mid-market and enterprise companies who need to catch lateral movement and credential theft before they become breaches should use Guardpot AI-Powered Cyber Deception for its zero false-positive detection model and Active Directory integration that actually flags stolen credentials in real time. The platform's hybrid deployment across physical and virtual assets combined with automated firewall blocking of detected malicious IPs means you're not just alerting on compromise; you're disrupting it immediately. Skip this if your priority is post-incident forensics or you need a vendor with a large support organization; Guardpot prioritizes early detection over investigative depth, and a five-person team means you're buying into a leaner model.

Honey Ports

Security teams running flat networks or lab environments who want to detect reconnaissance activity will find value in Honey Ports for its simplicity; Docker-based deployment means you're monitoring in minutes without infrastructure overhead. The free pricing and minimal dependencies make it practical for resource-constrained teams to stand up basic port-scan detection across internal segments. This isn't a fit for organizations needing sophisticated threat intelligence correlation, behavioral analysis, or integration with broader deception platforms; Honey Ports does one thing narrowly and well.