Havoc Framework vs Macro_Pack: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Havoc Framework is a free offensive security tool. Macro_Pack is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Red teams and penetration testers building custom C2 infrastructure will find Havoc's malleable profiles and team collaboration features faster to operationalize than Cobalt Strike, especially at zero cost. The 8,200-plus GitHub stars reflect active community contribution to payload obfuscation and evasion techniques that actually work against modern defenses. Skip this if your priority is managed C2 services or Windows-only operations; Havoc's strength is flexibility for operators who want to own their implant behavior, not outsource it.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need to rapidly generate obfuscated Office payloads without manual encoding will find Macro_Pack indispensable; the free cost and 2,300 GitHub stars reflect its adoption across professional assessments. The tool excels at shortening payload development cycles by automating VBA obfuscation techniques that would otherwise require custom scripting, making it particularly valuable for teams running multiple concurrent engagements. Skip this if your assessment scope excludes client-side Office exploitation or if your toolchain already includes mature payload generation frameworks; Macro_Pack solves one problem exceptionally well rather than replacing a full C2 platform.
