Ghost Security Exorcist vs GrammaTech Bug-Injector: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Ghost Security Exorcist

Development teams shipping APIs without visibility into their own endpoints will find Ghost Security Exorcist's automated discovery and inventory actually useful, particularly for catching undocumented or shadow APIs before they become vulnerabilities. The AI-driven BOLA and deserialization detection works across five languages with line-level remediation guidance, and daily differential scanning in CI/CD means you're not waiting for quarterly assessments. Skip this if you need a platform covering infrastructure scanning or runtime protection; Exorcist is narrowly focused on code and API risk, which is exactly why it works well for teams that have that specific problem.

GrammaTech Bug-Injector

Enterprise and mid-market security teams responsible for validating SAST and fuzzing tool effectiveness should use GrammaTech Bug-Injector to generate ground-truth test cases at scale; most competitors rely on synthetic or hand-crafted bugs that don't reflect real injection patterns. The tool's ability to produce unbiased test cases across multiple bug-finding techniques means you can actually measure whether your scanners catch what matters, addressing the NIST PR.PS gap most organizations have in platform security validation. Skip this if your team lacks the infrastructure expertise to run on-premises tools or if you need turnkey, cloud-hosted vulnerability generation without customization overhead.