genua Remote Maintenance vs PacketViper OT Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

genua Remote Maintenance

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing distributed maintenance access across critical industrial networks should pick genua Remote Maintenance because it enforces Zero Trust at the remote session layer, not just at the perimeter. The vendor's Security by Design architecture and explicit support for privileged access management mean you're not bolting trust controls onto a legacy remote tool. This is not for organizations seeking a single pane of glass across IT and OT security; genua focuses narrowly on the remote maintenance use case and assumes you already have asset monitoring and detection tooling in place.

PacketViper OT Security

Mid-market and enterprise operations teams protecting distributed ICS/OT assets will get the most from PacketViper OT Security because it actually contains lateral spread instead of just alerting on it, stopping threats at the facility level before they reach corporate IT. Zero false positive operation in unattended remote environments means you're not burning analyst hours on phantom incidents in hardened hardware deployed across temperature swings and humidity. Skip this if your environment is primarily centralized, cloud-native, or IT-focused; PacketViper is built for the physical constraints and air-gapped realities of industrial facilities, not general enterprise networks.