AhnLab CPS PLUS vs PacketViper OT Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AhnLab CPS PLUS

Mid-market and enterprise operations teams protecting manufacturing or critical infrastructure will find AhnLab CPS PLUS valuable for its unidirectional data diode capability and portable endpoint scanning, which work in air-gapped or severely restricted OT networks where standard agents fail. The platform covers 10 of 23 NIST CSF 2.0 functions with particular strength in asset identification, continuous monitoring, and incident analysis across IT and OT together. Skip this if your priority is recovery and resilience post-breach; AhnLab emphasizes prevention and detection over response coordination, and the Asia-Pacific vendor presence means longer support latencies for North American teams.

PacketViper OT Security

Mid-market and enterprise operations teams protecting distributed ICS/OT assets will get the most from PacketViper OT Security because it actually contains lateral spread instead of just alerting on it, stopping threats at the facility level before they reach corporate IT. Zero false positive operation in unattended remote environments means you're not burning analyst hours on phantom incidents in hardened hardware deployed across temperature swings and humidity. Skip this if your environment is primarily centralized, cloud-native, or IT-focused; PacketViper is built for the physical constraints and air-gapped realities of industrial facilities, not general enterprise networks.