FortifyData Third-Party Risk Management vs ResilientX TPRM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

FortifyData Third-Party Risk Management

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in vendor questionnaires will see immediate ROI from FortifyData Third-Party Risk Management because auto-validated surveys replace the manual back-and-forth that kills assessment cycles. The patented risk scoring with continuous attack surface monitoring means you're not waiting for annual reassessments to catch a third party's new vulnerability, and the Questionnaire Exchange lets you reuse validated responses across your supply chain instead of demanding each vendor fill out custom forms. Skip this if your third-party program is immature or your vendor base is under 50; the automation advantage only pays off when you're managing scale and assessment fatigue is a real problem.

ResilientX TPRM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing vendor sprawl across regulated industries should start here; ResilientX TPRM automates the questionnaire-to-monitoring lifecycle that otherwise demands manual spreadsheet work from stretched procurement and security staff. The platform maps directly to NIST GV.SC and ID.RA controls with built-in templates for NIS2 and DORA compliance, cutting weeks out of vendor onboarding cycles. Skip this if your third-party risk program is mature and already integrated into your broader GRC platform; ResilientX is best for organizations still doing vendor assessments ad hoc or outside their primary risk systems.