filancore Over-the-air vs SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

filancore Over-the-air

Enterprise and mid-market teams deploying embedded Linux devices at scale will get real value from filancore Over-the-air because it replaces fragile PKI certificate chains with verifiable credentials, eliminating a common attack surface in firmware supply chains. The YOCTO layer integration means you're not bolting this on after the fact; it embeds credential validation into your build and update pipeline, which directly addresses GV.SC supply chain risk. Skip this if your devices rarely update in the field or if you need vendor-agnostic firmware signing that works across heterogeneous hardware; filancore's strength is depth within Linux-based industrial systems, not breadth.

SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging

Enterprise and mid-market OT security teams protecting EV charging networks should evaluate SEALSQ Automotive EV Charging for its ISO 15118 Plug & Charge compliance and integrated PKI lifecycle management, which eliminates the common gap between charger hardware and identity provisioning that leaves most deployments vulnerable to protocol-level attacks. The vendor's VaultIC secure elements handle both certificate management and firmware updates within the same silicon, addressing the NIST PR.AA and PR.DS functions that most charging operators struggle to implement consistently across distributed charger fleets. Skip this if your EV charging infrastructure is still running legacy non-connected chargers or if you need application-layer visibility beyond the charging protocol itself; SEALSQ focuses narrowly on the authentication and encryption layer, not fleet operations or grid integration.