Checkmarx One DAST vs Escape DAST: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Checkmarx One DAST

Mid-market and enterprise security teams already running Checkmarx SAST will find Checkmarx One DAST indispensable for closing the runtime visibility gap; the centralized API inventory that correlates SAST and DAST findings eliminates the manual work of hunting down which backend endpoints actually matter. Browser-based authentication recording and multi-step login handling mean you'll actually test real user flows instead of abandoning DAST when login gets complicated. Skip this if your organization needs runtime protection that includes API threat prevention and response; Checkmarx One DAST finds vulnerabilities but doesn't block them in production.

Escape DAST

Mid-market and enterprise teams building APIs need Escape DAST for business logic flaws that traditional DAST misses; AI agents actually test authorization and state management instead of just fuzzing parameters. The tool's automated false-positive removal and contextual risk scoring cut triage time meaningfully, and native auth support (SSO, MFA) means you test realistic user flows without manual setup. Skip this if your apps are mostly monolithic web forms without complex API interactions; Escape's strengths disappear on static request-response patterns.