Discern for Mimecast vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Discern for Mimecast

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in Mimecast configuration drift will get immediate value from Discern for Mimecast because it maps your actual controls against MITRE ATT&CK and CIS frameworks, then automates remediation instead of just flagging gaps. The closed-loop policy enforcement cuts the typical discovery-to-fix cycle from weeks to days, and the peer benchmarking dashboard tells you honestly where you stand against similar organizations. Skip this if your Mimecast deployment is already locked down or if you lack the API access needed for continuous data ingestion; Discern only works well when you're willing to let it actively reshape your security posture.

Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Mid-market and enterprise security teams defending Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace should prioritize Mimecast Advanced Email Security for its social graphing and computer vision capabilities, which catch impersonation and BEC attacks that signature-based filters routinely miss. The platform scores across NIST's Detect and Prevention functions with sandboxing, on-click URL protection, and contextual banners that work together to stop threats after inbox delivery. Skip this if your organization needs email security bundled with broader cloud access control or data loss prevention; Mimecast stays focused on threat detection rather than competing with DLP platforms.