DBAppSecurity DAS Web Application Firewall vs SiteLock Pro: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

DBAppSecurity DAS Web Application Firewall

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting distributed web applications across multiple regions will find DAS Web Application Firewall's machine learning-based threat detection and transparent proxy deployment modes solve the real problem: stopping OWASP Top 10 attacks without forcing application redesigns. The dual-protocol support (IPv4 and IPv6) plus centralized management across deployments means you're not managing separate WAF instances per region. Skip this if your primary concern is API-specific threats rather than traditional web application attacks, or if you need deep behavioral analytics on legitimate traffic; DAS prioritizes blocking over forensic instrumentation.

SiteLock Pro

SMBs and mid-market teams without dedicated security staff should pick SiteLock Pro for its automated malware scanning and one-click WordPress patching, which eliminate the manual work of staying ahead of common vulnerabilities. The platform covers four critical NIST functions,Platform Security, Infrastructure Resilience, Continuous Monitoring, and Risk Assessment,reflecting a breadth that handles both prevention and detection simultaneously. Skip this if you need granular WAF tuning or run non-WordPress CMS platforms; SiteLock's automation works best for teams that want security to run in the background.