Cyolo Remote Privileged Access vs WALLIX One Remote Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cyolo Remote Privileged Access

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting OT/ICS environments will find Cyolo Remote Privileged Access most valuable for its agentless architecture, which sidesteps the deployment friction that kills PAM projects in operational technology shops running legacy hardware. The vendor's support for OEM vendor access management directly addresses NIST PR.AA (limiting asset access to authorized users) without requiring agents on control systems that can't tolerate them. Skip this if your priority is insider threat detection or forensic depth; Cyolo maps cleanly to access control and session recording but doesn't prioritize the incident analysis capabilities that threat-hunting teams demand.

WALLIX One Remote Access

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing third-party vendor access without expanding their attack surface should evaluate WALLIX One Remote Access, since it eliminates VPN and credential sharing while enforcing time-limited JIT permissions at the point of access. The platform's strength in PR.AA (identity and access control) combined with DE.CM continuous monitoring means you get real-time visibility into who accessed what and when, which matters when audit trails are your liability hedge. Skip this if you need deep integration with your identity fabric or expect a single pane of glass for both vendor access and employee privileged access management; WALLIX segregates from Active Directory by design, not accident, which solves a specific problem but isn't a replacement for full PAM.