Cyberhaven Data Loss Prevention vs Fortinet FortiDLP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cyberhaven Data Loss Prevention

Teams managing sensitive data across distributed endpoints and cloud apps need Cyberhaven Data Loss Prevention because data lineage tracking catches exfiltration attempts that content-only DLP tools miss, especially when attackers move data through unfamiliar workflows or obfuscate it. The platform reduces false positives through contextual analysis rather than signature matching, which matters in mid-market and enterprise environments where alert fatigue kills program adoption. Skip this if your org has minimal data movement between systems or runs exclusively on-prem with locked-down infrastructure; Cyberhaven's strength is visibility into messy, real-world data flows, and you won't need that sophistication everywhere.

Fortinet FortiDLP

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in SaaS sprawl will get the most from Fortinet FortiDLP because its shadow AI monitoring actually catches unauthorized GenAI tool use, not just file transfers. The machine learning classifier handles real-time content inspection across endpoints while the insider risk sequence detection spots behavior patterns that static rules miss. Skip this if you need strong recovery and remediation capabilities; FortiDLP prioritizes detection and blocking over incident response coordination, leaving you to orchestrate the aftermath with other tools.