Akeyless Secure Remote Access vs Conjur OSS: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Akeyless Secure Remote Access

Teams managing infrastructure across multiple cloud providers or hybrid environments should choose Akeyless Secure Remote Access to eliminate standing credentials entirely, replacing them with identity-driven just-in-time access tied directly to your SSO. The secretless architecture maps cleanly to NIST PR.AA controls by design, removing the attack surface that traditional PAM tools still carry. Skip this if your infrastructure is entirely on-premises and air-gapped; the cloud-native architecture assumes identity provider integration as your primary authentication mechanism.

Conjur OSS

DevOps and platform teams building on Kubernetes or cloud infrastructure should adopt Conjur OSS because it solves the hardest part of secrets management: getting non-human identities authenticated and authorized without embedding credentials in code or config files. The Secretless Broker feature eliminates the most common way applications leak secrets, and automated identity enrollment means you're not manually provisioning access for every new container or host in elastic environments. Skip this if you need commercial support, audit compliance enforcement, or a managed control plane; Conjur OSS is free but you're running the security operations yourself.