What features do Akeyless AI Agent Security vs Conjur OSS offer?

**Akeyless AI Agent Security** differentiates with Dynamic secrets generation with just-in-time access, Zero-knowledge cryptography using Distributed Fragments Cryptography, Ephemeral identity federation across cloud, SaaS, and on-prem. **Conjur OSS** differentiates with Secrets storage and secure distribution to applications, Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for non-human identities, Application authentication prior to secret access.

Who makes Akeyless AI Agent Security vs Conjur OSS?

**Akeyless AI Agent Security** is developed by Akeyless Security. **Conjur OSS** is developed by Conjur. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Akeyless AI Agent Security a good alternative to Conjur OSS?

Akeyless AI Agent Security and Conjur OSS serve similar Privileged Access Management use cases: both are Privileged Access Management tools, both cover Secrets Management. Key differences: Akeyless AI Agent Security is Commercial while Conjur OSS is Free. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Akeyless AI Agent Security vs Conjur OSS (2026) | Compare Privileged Access Management Tools

Q: What is the difference between Akeyless AI Agent Security vs Conjur OSS?

**Akeyless AI Agent Security**: Identity provider for AI agents with secrets mgmt and access control. built by Akeyless Security. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include Dynamic secrets generation with just-in-time access, Zero-knowledge cryptography using Distributed Fragments Cryptography, Ephemeral identity federation across cloud, SaaS, and on-prem.. **Conjur OSS**: Open source secrets mgmt tool for non-human access control via RBAC. built by Conjur. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include Secrets storage and secure distribution to applications, Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for non-human identities, Application authentication prior to secret access.. Both serve the Privileged Access Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.