CloudDefense.AI QINA vs HAWK: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
CloudDefense.AI QINA is a commercial cloud-native application protection platform tool by CloudDefense.AI. HAWK is a free cloud-native application protection platform tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cloud-native application protection platform fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Security teams at mid-market and enterprise organizations need CloudDefense.AI QINA if they're tired of stitching together separate tools for code, container, and cloud security. The sub-60 second CI/CD scan completion and AI-powered reachability analysis actually reduce alert fatigue instead of just claiming to, and native support for SAST, DAST, API testing, and CSPM means you're not maintaining six different vendor relationships. Skip this if your team lacks the infrastructure maturity to act on multi-layered findings quickly; QINA will surface real vulnerabilities across your entire stack, but weak remediation workflows will leave you buried.
Teams scanning cloud object storage for malware in multi-cloud environments should use HAWK for its API-first design that integrates directly into S3, Blob Storage, and Cloud Storage ingestion pipelines without agents or sidecars. The dual-engine approach using CLAMAV and YARA signatures catches both known malware and custom indicators, which is why it's genuinely useful for detecting compromised uploads before they propagate. Skip HAWK if you need behavioral detection or threat hunting; it's signature-based scanning only, so zero-days and polymorphic malware will slip through.
