Claroty xDome Secure Access vs Twingate Zero Trust Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Claroty xDome Secure Access

Enterprise and mid-market teams managing industrial control systems or healthcare devices will get the most from Claroty xDome Secure Access because it treats CPS asset discovery and exposure mapping as a prerequisite to access control, not an afterthought. The platform covers ID.AM and PR.AA across NIST CSF 2.0, meaning you get genuine asset inventory before you lock down who touches what, and the hybrid deployment model handles both air-gapped and connected environments without requiring full network redesigns. Skip this if your priority is detection speed over access prevention; xDome's strength is keeping unauthorized users off the network entirely, not catching them after they're in.

Twingate Zero Trust Platform

Security teams managing hybrid workforces across multiple resource types will get the most from Twingate Zero Trust Platform because it eliminates the VPN entirely and replaces it with direct-to-resource connectivity tied to device posture and identity, cutting the attack surface that comes with traditional network access. The platform covers PR.AA and PR.IR in NIST CSF 2.0 through least privilege automation and device-specific controls, with session recording for auditability. Skip this if you need deep forensic capabilities post-breach; Twingate prioritizes access control over detection and response workflows.